Wordocracy Or Why the World Needs More Norman Oders

Some people say we're headed for an idiocracy. Still others a one world goverment...but I think we're headed for a wordocracy, Steve Sailer points out:

As I've pointed out before, the Age of Ideology—when the big questions were simple ones, such as Communism vs. Capitalism —is over. We live in the Age of the Fine Print, where the devil is in the details.

He further writes:
In reality, the MSM want the issue to be taken care of in a hurry behind closed doors, because otherwise. if public debate were encouraged, it would be "divisive." And in a republic, we aren't supposed to have political divisions over legislation determining the future of the country, now are we? We are supposed to delegate that to famously wise men like Senator Kennedy and President Bush with their long records of outstanding judgment, while we peons can worry about more important matters like Paris Hilton's jail sentence.

Atlantic Yards is another example of this. On the surface its about jobs housing and hoops...sounds good until you read the fine print - something most of us simply don't have the time to do. Then you find out that there is no affordable housing, few jobs and lots of pork.

So it goes with this immigration bill - MSM makes broad sweeping editorials about this 'ending the problem' when in the fine print no one - even the senators voting on it - have time to read - its really a floodgate towards literallly dismantling our republic.

Chertoff, Kennedy and other traitors (no other word for them, sorry if it sounds bombastic , but it's true) then, like Ratner, play the race card - oh you must be some sort of bigot if you're against this.

As one black caller to Bill O'Reliely said:

A black caller from LA told bill that in 10 to 15 years we would be driven out of our region by the Mexican invasion and the changes it would bring.

The caller wanted to know how we (white people) could be willing to lose our own country just so that we would not be called "racists"? The puzzlement in his voice was priceless.

Puzzling indeed.

---

Here's an example of Chertoff's attitude (keep in mind he has REFUSED to defend our borders POST 9-11 - why this puzzling behavior?!):
Most Outrageous Comment Regarding Opponents To “Comprehensive ...19 May 2007 by Joe Guzzardi
…goes to Michael Chertoff who suggested that many who oppose the Senate’s concept of immigration reform would not be satisfied with anything less than “capital punishment” for illegal aliens.