Thursday, December 20, 2007

The Danger Of Idealogly.

Americans, too busy worrying about saving salamander breeds, who's going to win American Idol or the superbowl, and perhaps too sheepish to realize that their country has become as ideologically radical as Bolshivik Russia; and I think it's only a matter of time before it becomes as destructive - something it has already needlessly attained in countries like Iraq.

They vent their anger on media driven outrage on treatment of dogs, but are indifferent that Palestinians are often treated worst. The media gets into huff over fake rape cases, yet ignores the fact that the rape rate in many European cities is six times that of New York, in direct consequence of open immigration.

Most Americans don't want to realize that our country power has steadily drifted into the hands of an elite with a radical agenda that is openly in contempt of mainstream America (Harvard Prof. Sam Huntington's book, "Who Are We" documents this). On the left they blame Republicans, on the right they blame Liberals. But increasingly, there is little distinction between democrat and republican - frontrunner Hillary Clinton is the #1 recipient of money from both the arms industry and the Israeli lobby -yet is portrayed as the ultimate of liberal ideals (and in many ways, she is). Mike Huckabee is trotted out in mainstream media as a traditional conservative, yet he advocates amnesty of illegals and will probably do worse if he gets in office. Bush ran on a humble foreign policy and against nation building...and we know where that's led. More recently, Americans, outraged over illegal immigration voted in candidates that pledged to build a security fence. Once in office they thumbed their nose at voters, perhaps smirking under their breath 'suckers, they never learn'.

In his book 'Day of Reckoning' Pat Buchanan illustrates how a small elite under the guise of 'democracy' and spreading democracy, has duped people into surrendering enormous amounts of power, despite the evidence that they are no more concerned about democracy than Bolshiviks were about 'equality'.

Idealogy, Buchanan states, is a substitute religion - and often more fanatic than the worst fundamentalists - a perfect illustration is atheist Richard Dawkins, who assures us if we could just get rid of religion there would be little or no problems in the world. He goes on to give examples of Northern Ireland, Israel-Palestine, Pakistan-India, and ignores examples of the Tamil Tigers and atheistic regimes which slaughtered millions, a display of ignorance remarkable in it breadth - and Dawkins is one of the allegedly smart secular humanists - lower on the food chain...errr evolutionary tree - they "just don't want 'religious' people 'moralizing'" and simply see it as a great justification for legalizing pederasty and a veil in which to vent their hatred of Christianity and the West.

There are two characteristics of the Ideology driven
a. Convinced that their 'way ' will lead to a new golden age, those who embrace the religion of Ideology are oblivious to reality - as evidenced by the overwhelming facts about the failure of multiculturalism, of open borders and 'free' (fake free) trade, of imposing democracy on peoples not suited for them. Did neocons truly believe that if just given the right to vote, Iraq would turn into a cosmopolitan paradise?

which leads me to b. : The hallmark of Ideologues, no matter what flavor of benefit they claim to be bringing (French Revolution: Rights of Man, various Communists: Equality, Neoconservatism: Democracy) is increased authoritarianism. We see this in the EU, with increased 'hate speech' laws and other such restrictions which are in direct consequence of the failure of their 'theories' to work, and in America where we steadily have our rights eroded so we can 'bring freedom to the world'.

Buchanan quotes George Orwell's observation that "ideology animates 'the streamlined men who think in slogans and talk in bullets.'" and Kirk's that neocons were 'often clever....never wise'.

Both are true and we have not even seen the beginning of the consequences.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Good Question Steve Sailer>..

Steve S. asks:
Question

Is any Presidential candidate running on the issue: "No bailout for subprime lenders and borrowers"? This seems exactly like an issue where the public's moral prejudices are in sync with economic theory, yet the special interests seem likely to get bailed out at the taxpayer's expense.

Or, how about: "No bailout for fraudulent lenders and borrowers"? Is that too much to ask?

We've moved from the age of the Invisible Hand to the age of the Invisible Thumb on the Scale.




Answer. Ron Paul, of course.

Others wish to keep postponing the inevitable.



An astute commentator writes:
It's called moral hazard, Steve. Greenspan pushed ARMs as a legitimate means of financing a home. He did so to goose the economy, and to comply with the Administration's desire to have more minority (read: blacks and browns) home owners.

Why wouldn't he? After all George Bush is the master of socializing risks, and privatizing gains. That's what illegal immigration is all about.


note: Bruce Ratner could give George Bush a run for his money in 'socilizing risks, privatizing gains' category.

The Knickerblogger Advent, Day 4.



One of the true joys of the Christmas Season, the Met museum's Creche.



Like dance and certain types of live music - and I might add, paintings - this really has to be experienced in person - the scale, and magic of the whole scene can't be conveyed through photographs. Sometimes its interesting to just watch the expression on people's faces when they see it.

It goes in a circle around a large tree decorated with 16-18th century angel ornaments - I remember that the tree in my home as a child had a similar angel which my great uncle had looted brought back from Germany after WWI.

The best way I can describe this creche without seeing it in person is it has the color and composition richness of a Italian barque painting but is in 3d. I never tire of seeing it.

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

Best Film of 2007 Out On Netflix/DVD Today

...Once:


...and I will be watching. Especially looking forward to the extras and Director's comments.

"“I don’t want this. This is nothing,”"

And The Wall Street Journal is still harping how open borders and 'free' (for China) trade is good for us....From the NYT:

Paid in Dollars, Some Americans Are Struggling in Europe
By DOREEN CARVAJAL

PARIS — Erica Nevins’s faith in the dollar was shaken the moment she pressed a crumpled $1 bill into the hand of a little girl begging for money on the streets of Marrakesh, Morocco.

“I don’t want this. This is nothing,” Ms. Nevins recalled the scornful reaction of the child, who demanded more.

Since then Ms. Nevins, an American fashion executive, has replayed that moment over and over in her head as she confronts the harsh reality of living on a dollar income in Paris and then moving to costly London. “The absurdity of this is that it’s so true,” she said. “A dollar really means nothing. It’s scary.”

National Review Joins the Anti Christmas Crowd.

Further proof Neoconservatives are simply Trotskites in disguise.

National Review Attacks Huckabee For Wishing Americans A Merry Christmas

Tom Piatak writes:

National Review long ago ran up the white flag in the War against Christmas. Now, it is joining the other side, with Kathryn Jean Lopez echoing a reader’s complaint that Mike Huckabee’s ad wishing everyone a Merry Christmas is “offensive:”

It’s hard to fathom the source of Lopez’ outrage. There is absolutely nothing preventing all the candidates from running similar ads. In fact, Ron Paul has run a similar internet ad. Wishing someone “Merry Christmas” used to be as American as apple pie. Now it is suspect, and subject to endless second guessing and analysis. We will know the enemies of Christmas have been defeated when Americans, once again, wish each other “Merry Christmas” as a matter of course, with no one questioning their motives or claiming to be “offended.”

Advent Day 3, December 18, 2007


"I have endeavoured in this Ghostly little book, to raise the Ghost of an Idea, which shall not put my readers out of humour with themselves, with each other, with the season, or with me. May it haunt their houses pleasantly, and no one wish to lay it.

Their faithful Friend and Servant,
C. D.
December, 1843

My favorite passage::
Scrooge was better than his word. He did it all, and infinitely more; and to Tiny Tim, who did not die, he was a second father. He became as good a friend, as good a master, and as good a man, as the good old city knew, or any other good old city, town, or borough, in the good old world. Some people laughed to see the alteration in him, but he let them laugh, and little heeded them; for he was wise enough to know that nothing ever happened on this globe, for good, at which some people did not have their fill of laughter in the outset; and knowing that such as these would be blind anyway, he thought it quite as well that they should wrinkle up their eyes in grins, as have the malady in less attractive forms. His own heart laughed: and that was quite enough for him..

Death of Dissent.

From Gates of Vienna:

A Blueprint for the Suppression of Dissent in Europe

The EUSSRThe disappearance of liberty in Europe will not be accompanied by the loud knock of a jackbooted thug at the front door.

Basic freedoms are already being eroded imperceptibly by the European Union. The process has been going on for many years, drip by silent drip. In order to create Eurabia, the will of the people is muffled, suppressed, and discarded by the elites of the EU....

It states that “neo-Nazi, paramilitary and other extremisms are directing their violent attacks against a wide variety of vulnerable population groups, including migrants, the Roma, homosexuals, anti-racist activists”.

The EU Parliament actually mentions Islamic fundamentalism, giving a passing nod to the real danger now facing Europe. But we know from experience that its targets will inevitably be the patriots and supporters of traditional European culture. To the EU, controlling Islamic fundamentalism means restraining European natives to keep them from “provoking” Islam.



The same can be said here. Slowly bled to death...slowly sued, pc'ed, bullied. Not quite enough to provoke a reaction and usually, when there is, some token gesture to let off steam, but slowly, quietly it continues.

Sobering but Necessary Reading.



I am only on Chapter 1, and I can't say its put me in the brightest of moods. I hear on the left, Naimo Wolf has a book which echos similar sentiments. As stated before on this here blog, the baby boom generation will be remembered as the most irresponsible, destructive generation in American history.

"Naomi Wolf and Pat Buchanan on the end of America

Goodbye to America, by Paul Craig Roberts

Pat Buchanan is too patriotic to come right out and say it, but the message of his new book, "Day of Reckoning," is that America as we have known her is finished. Moreover, Naomi Wolf agrees with him. These two writers of different political persuasions arrive at America's demise from different directions."




Note that most msm (main stream media) is sticking its head in the sand about the serious issues confronting this country - the only exception perhaps being Lou Dobbs. As indicated elsewhere people who own those companies, and the companies that advertise with them are making enormous profits - because the 'system' is rigged to help them and hurt us (us being lower to upper middle class america)

....


Its interesting to note, in addition to being called a deluge of names by both the left and the neoconservative right - ever since he called them on their game in 1990 - everything Pat Buchanan has predicted has come to pass...and next to nothing the Neocons have predicted has come true. ...unless you count Michael Ledeen's famous 'Creative Destruction" comment - well, we got the destruction part down, eh?

The Myth Of Mediterranean Inefficiency.


Having recently visited Madrid for the second time, I am always pleasantly surprised by the cleanliness, efficiency and ease of use of their public transportation - the Metro in particular. You never have to wait more than 5 minutes for a train - in fact, I never waited more than a couple of minutes - you know how long you have to wait because there is an indicator which displays the number of minutes until the next train. And the map and layout or so intuitive that I was able to grasp it rather easily despite a shaky grip on Spanish.

Compared to the dirty, run down, confusing NYC subway system it is a pleasure to ride. One might say I am making an unfair comparison - I ride the MTA daily and therefore are more likely to run in a delayed train. It could also be sheer size- the MTA system is much larger, the physical size and length of the cars is longer as well. But I don't think it is just that. Almost daily, riding the Q, I find the arrival times inconsistent, inevitably somewhere along the line the train stops and we get the tiresome "please be patient" and overall the New York stations are filthy. Oh yeah and notice that pink line? It's not the homo express, but rather a remarkably efficient and fast connection to the airport something both JFK and LGA are lacking - sorry the dirty broken down A train and the overpriced poorly built Patki-boondoggle shuttle doesn't cut i.t

Not once did any metro stop at anywhere other than a station, and Spanish officials apparently believe that Madrid commuter can do something New Yorkers can't - open the doors of when the train is stopped. I also noticed that people don't hold the doors open - presumably because the trains run so much more frequently there isn't the 'scarcity' mentality.

I am sure some slick PR man at city hall will tell us that clean, efficient trains, and even a desire for them are a sign of fascism, and that we're much better off with dirty run down unreliable trains staffed by a 'diverse' work force. But really wouldn't it be better to put efforts into getting our subway system to look like this (and believe me the Madrid metro runs as good as it looks) than silly boondoggles like Atlantic Yards? Of course how could you build such stations and systems with taxpayer money and not fleece the system at the same time? I guess that's the problem.




The same is true for the Paris metro, thought it has been some years since I last been there and I wonder if 'diversity' and mass North African immigration has turned the Paris Metro into a New York like war zone as it has the outer ring of housing surrounding Paris.,

However, I also discovered the rail systems of Morocco and southern Spain are much cheaper (even with the crappy US dollar) than Amtrak - which I have taken both on the East and West coast. There were no delays, it was easy to transfer and figure out where I was going, and even the aging Moroccan trains were cleaner and smoother rides than Amtrak. They seem to get things done quicker too. Last time I was in Seville, the main streets running by the cathedral were auto - that less than three years ago - within that time the turned them into a pedestrian zone and installed a nifty street car system. . How long has the second avenue line been under discussion?

I wonder if Europeans coming here make the same observation and along with the cheap dollar, are starting to think that perhaps we're not quite as advanced as we thought.

In any event with rising fuel prices, such neglect of our mass transit systems might be more than just a cause casual observation in coming years.

Monday, December 17, 2007

NY Millionaires Guilty Of Slavery?

So typical of msm bs reporting:
Millionaires guilty of 'modern-day slavery'
Convicted of forced labor of Indonesian women; could face 40-year sentences
The Associated Press
updated 11:24 a.m. ET, Mon., Dec. 17, 2007

CENTRAL ISLIP, N.Y. - A jury on Monday convicted a millionaire couple of enslaving two Indonesian women they brought to their mansion to work as housekeepers.

Mahender Murlidhar Sabhnani, 51, and his wife, Varsha Mahender Sabhnani, 45, were each convicted of all charges in a 12-count federal indictment that included forced labor, conspiracy, involuntary servitude, and harboring aliens.




Yeah, they sound like some old money WASPs or German-American Jews from the 400 list eh? So how about mentioning they are foreigners who come from cultures where such treatment is commonplace. "New York" Millionaires? Give me a break. Why don't main stream media companies remind us this is one of the joys of multiculturalism and an example of how diversity enriches us? Yeah many of our millionaires or greedy, stupid and corrupt, but as far as I know they don't practice slavery...yet.

If we get enough people like the Sabhnani's here, tell them there is no need to assimilate because well, diversity enriches us.... will objections to this sort of behavior be met with indifference? I am also genuinely surprised they haven't played the race card..yet.

The Knickerblogger Advent Calender, Day 2 (we take weekends off)



Ah good ole pre-Coca Cola Father Christmas. And what happened to only good children getting gifts? In our post sixties...oh darn I am bitching again.

A Bad Year For Bollywood.

Salaam e isque had some great music and typical bollywood like dance numbers, but over all was a great disappointment. Ditto for Eklayva - though it was probably the best film of the year from India, and Guru.

I was also very disappointed with Vidya Balan's roles: she was great in Guru but her role was far too short, and the one film where she had an expanded role - Heyy Babyy was a great disappointment. It had one good song:



Hopefull 2008 will be better? One thing, she did have a great makeover:

And she endears herself to me by saying things like this::

Mumbai, Nov 16: Vidya Balan, who was recently seen in a glamorous role in "Heyy Babyy", is happy being called a demure Indian girl.

"That's my USP and why should I shy away from it? Even if I tried to be a floozy, I'd be a disaster. Even when I played a radio-jockey in Raj Kumar Hirani's film, I wore kurtas, skirts and other desi accessories. I'm not like a hip radio-jockey from Australia," Vidya told IANS.

"I'd have been happy to be born 40 years ago and live my life in a sari," she added.

Amitabh Bachchan once said you can't take your eyes off Vidya when she is on screen.




True true AB.

Ron Paul Raised 6 Million Dollars in One Day.

Of course candidates like McCain and Hillary can raise that in the minute but the difference here is that this coming from the people, not a few wealthy donors and big corporations. I do believe that Ron Paul is the 'last hope' for the republic. If any of the mainstream candidates get elected, it will be the final push over the edge both internationally - because there will be no real change to our destructive foreign policy - and internally - our personal liberties, our borders and our economy will continue to erode.

Friday, December 14, 2007

The KnickerBlogger Advent Calander, Post 1





Hmm how does one do this?? Well, I'll just make up as I go along. One of my favorite images from Ivanhoe is when he comes upon a the lean too hobbit like forest dwelling of Friar Tuck:

"I hope, Sir Knight," said the hermit, "thou hast given no good
reason for thy surname of the Sluggard. I do promise thee I
suspect thee grievously. Nevertheless, thou art my guest, and I
will not put thy manhood to the proof without thine own free
will. Sit thee down, then, and fill thy cup; let us drink, sing,
and be merry. If thou knowest ever a good lay, thou shalt be
welcome to a nook of pasty at Copmanhurst so long as I serve the
chapel of St Dunstan, which, please God, shall be till I change
my grey covering for one of green turf. But come, fill a flagon,
for it will crave some time to tune the harp; and nought pitches
the voice and sharpens the ear like a cup of wine. For my part,
I love to feel the grape at my very finger-ends before they make
the harp-strings tinkle."*


"Wassail" comes from the Saxon Toast: toast wæs þu hæl, "be thou hale"

Gloucestor Wassail Lyrics:
Wassail! wassail! all over the town,
Our toast it is white and our ale it is brown;
Our bowl it is made of the white maple tree;
With the wassailing bowl, we'll drink to thee.

Here's to our horse, and to his right ear,
God send our master a happy new year:
A happy new year as e'er he did see,
With my wassailing bowl I drink to thee.

So here is to Cherry and to his right cheek
Pray God send our master a good piece of beef
And a good piece of beef that may we all see
With the wassailing bowl, we'll drink to thee.

Here's to our mare, and to her right eye,
God send our mistress a good Christmas pie;
A good Christmas pie as e'er I did see,
With my wassailing bowl I drink to thee.

So here is to Broad Mary and to her broad horn
May God send our master a good crop of corn
And a good crop of corn that may we all see
With the wassailing bowl, we'll drink to thee.

And here is to Fillpail and to her left ear
Pray God send our master a happy New Year
And a happy New Year as e'er he did see
With the wassailing bowl, we'll drink to thee.

Here's to our cow, and to her long tail,
God send our master us never may fail
Of a cup of good beer: I pray you draw near,
And our jolly wassail it's then you shall hear.

Come butler, come fill us a bowl of the best
Then we hope that your soul in heaven may rest
But if you do draw us a bowl of the small
Then down shall go butler, bowl and all.

Be here any maids? I suppose here be some;
Sure they will not let young men stand on the cold stone!
Sing hey O, maids! come trole back the pin,
And the fairest maid in the house let us all in.

Then here's to the maid in the lily white smock
Who tripped to the door and slipped back the lock
Who tripped to the door and pulled back the pin
For to let these jolly wassailers in.

Another thought about the ESDC's security Brush-Off

The ESDC, sorry the 'new' 'everything changes' ESDC brushes off security concerns by saying that welp, there are other poorly secured stadiums- like Madison Square so why can't we built one.

As 9-11 taught us, security breaches come from where we least expected - prior to 9-11 if i had heard a story about terrorists hijacking a plane and crashing it into buildings i would have brushed it off as implausible James Bond like fiction, as my own eyes saw that day, it was not. So knowingly building something that is a security risk - as a steel and glass building on a major intersection over a major transportation hub so obviously is - means that security will have to be on guard for the obvious and therefore not be able to devote resources to anticipate or prevent the not so obvious.

IF this crap is built - and if it is built by Gehry it will be crap - and if such a disaster does occur, I think Ratner, if he is still alive should be held responsible, as should Gargano and Pataki - and prosecuted for violating public safety.

Doctroff Disaster....Let the Buck Passing Begin

From No Land Grab:

Doctoroff’s disaster

The Brooklyn Paper, Editorial

We always knew that the Atlantic Yards project would afford The Brooklyn Paper with many occasions over the next 30 years to say, “We told you so.”

We just didn’t expect to get them so soon.
...
There is no question that if Atlantic Yards had gone through ULURP [NYC's Uniform Land Use Review Procedure], many of the project’s worst excesses — its massive scale, its overly generous public subsidies, its use of eminent domain — would have been softened.

article

NoLandGrab: Atlantic Yards developer Bruce Ratner and his political backers obviously felt that ULURP would have stood in the way of Ratner's primary goals — clearly, receiving comprehensive, meaningful input from the community wasn't one of them.




why all this jockeying? Why does the ESDC (while vigorously defending the project in court) throw up their hands and say that horse has left the barn? Because Politicians are probably keenly aware if built, Atlantic Yards will be a financial, aesthetic and possibly terrorist disaster (the WTC and the notorious Pruitt-Igoe Project all in one!) No one wants to be associated with it - and ground hasn't even broken yet. What does that tell you?

Recently the Intelligence community did the unprecedented -they went straight to the press and announced that Iran had given up nukes- presumably to avoid being blamed for another agenda driven war by Bush - and probably to avert another Neocon induced foreign policy disaster for America - I can imagine the same sort of sentiment is arising in the city and state agencies associated with this project - they will get all the blame - even Ratner will be able to point the finger at them while reaping all the benefits. Likewise, in the same way Bush and the neocons got what they wanted (war) and then said "whoops! well, we thought their were WMD", expect a lot of politicians to engage in this fake remorse.

Sorry Lefties, Joe McCarthy Was Right.

Ann Coulter:

The anti-McCarthy oeuvre has zippy titles, such as "The Nightmare Decade: The Life and Times of Senator Joe McCarthy," "Joe McCarthy and McCarthyism: The Hate That Haunts America" and "How I, Al Gore, Stopped Joe McCarthy's Hate Campaign" – although that last one may have been made up during the 2000 campaign by a hostile media.

Fifty years later, the only true history book ever written about McCarthy has finally been released: M. Stanton Evans' "Blacklisted by History: The Untold Story of Senator Joe McCarthy and His Fight Against America's Enemies." Liberals have responded with vicious attacks and – naturally – claims the book merely recites "old news."

So I think I'm entitled to at least a few columns on the book that finally tells the truth about the DNFUJM.

"Historian" Ronald Radosh's slanderous attack on Evans' book in the Dec. 17 National Review delusionally claims that Evans used Radosh's own crappy book, "The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism," as a primary, uncredited source for "Blacklisted by History."

It is now painfully clear that Radosh was the Yoko Ono of that collaboration. Radosh's co-author, Harvey Klehr, at least went on to write wonderful, scathing accounts of liberal collaboration with communism, including "Venona: Decoding Soviet Espionage in America" as well as one of the greatest books ever written, "In Denial: Historians, Communism and Espionage."

Consequently, I shall now refer to Klehr's only bad book as "Radosh's book."

Here is a complete summary of Radosh's book on Amerasia: Liberals were wrong – but so were right-wingers! Now let's talk some more about the failings of right-wingers.

Radosh's book hints at the fact that John Stewart Service, U.S. diplomat and communist collaborator, connived to turn over China to Mao Zedong and passed hundreds of pages of classified government documents to Soviet spies working at the magazine Amerasia. (Or as Radosh put it, liberals whose careers "suggested" they were Soviet spies.)

Radosh then massages these facts to death until the whole story is whittled away to nothing. This allows Radosh to turn to the real knaves of the story: right-wingers.

Not surprisingly, a few years after the release of Radosh's snoozefest of a book, the New York Times' obituary on John Stewart Service could say that Service "filed prescient reports" from China on the weakness and corruption of Chiang Kai-shek's Nationalists – who happened to be our allies, under siege from Mao Zedong's Communists.

As Evans' book makes eminently clear, this is like saying: "John Hinckley wrote prescient reports that Reagan would be shot."

Although it is possible, with a great deal of work, to slog through Radosh's endless "on the one hand, on the other hand" disquisitions in order to glean an occasional fact from his Amerasia book – presumably inserted by his co-author Klehr – it is not possible to believe that Evans got a single comma from Radosh's book.

Radosh's boast is a bit like claiming that Martin Scorcese's film "The Last Temptation of Christ" was a primary, uncredited source for the authors of the holy Bible.

Evans' copiously footnoted book makes clear that his Amerasia information comes directly from the FBI's files. Not only that, Evans has been writing about the FBI files on Amerasia since at least 10 years before Radosh's book.

Among the reasons we know this is from Radosh's own book – published in 1996 – in which Radosh attacks Evans by name for an article Evans wrote about the FBI's Amerasia file in Human Events – in 1986. Radosh's book is so bad, apparently even he can't bear to read it.

So it takes a special sort of fabulist to write, as Radosh does in National Review: "Full disclosure: Harvey Klehr and I are co-authors of 'The Amerasia Spy Case: Prelude to McCarthyism,' a book from which Evans takes virtually all of his material and which he does not acknowledge."

If Evans had done that, instead of an exciting book full of true spy stories and dastardly Democratic malfeasance based on FBI wiretaps and surveillance, he would have written a boring book with an endless amount of agnostic gymnastics to avoid saying there was a Democratic cover-up. You know, like Radosh's book.

Radosh has been on the fence so long that the fence has pierced his buttocks and is affecting his brain.

George Bush Should Be Impeached

Buchanan on Bush:
The White House campaign to stampede this nation into war, to smash Iran's nuclear facilities before she acquires the capability to build an atom bomb, has been derailed, probably for the duration of the Bush presidency.

And the Bush policy – to leave the military option on the table while pressing China, Russia and NATO to back tougher sanctions in the Security Council – has been torpedoed.

Who are the sappers of the Bush policy? The leaders of the 16 intelligence agencies Bush commands. For even as he was raising the specter of "nuclear holocaust" and "World War III," those 16 agencies downgraded and virtually dismissed the threat, by declaring that Iran suspended its drive for nuclear weapons – in 2003.

To have the intelligence community make a public declaration that undermines the foreign policy of a president, even as it calls his credibility into question, is unprecedented.

Nor is that the only astonishing aspect of the new National Intelligence Estimate that flatly contradicts the 2005 NIE, which had concluded that Iran was plowing ahead toward a nuclear weapon.


For if the intelligence agencies were 100 percent wrong about Iraq's WMD, the casus belli of today's war, and they have been 100 percent wrong for four years about Iran's drive for nuclear weapons, how can we trust them? How can we rely on them in formulating policy?

And if we cannot trust our intelligence agencies to distinguish disinformation from truth, and if we have blundered horribly once into war and almost blundered a second time, how can we justify the Bush policy of pre-emptive strikes and preventive war?

Other questions arise.

What did the president know, and when did he know it?


Was Bush aware that Iran had abandoned its nuclear weapons program, years ago, when he was using his apocalyptic rhetoric about nuclear holocaust and World War III?

If so, that is indefensible.

And if the NIE is right today, why was it wrong again in 2005, two years after the intelligence community was wrong about Iraq's WMD? Why did it take us longer than World World II – from 2003 to late 2007 – to find out the truth about our putative enemy?

The NIE also reports that Iran probably lacks the capability to produce a nuclear weapon until between 2010 and 2015.

This implies that the uranium enrichment being done at Natanz is either not proceeding at the pace President Ahmadinejad claims, or the centrifuges are not working. For if Iran were actually running 3,000 centrifuges at full speed, and they were working properly, we have been told Iran could have enough fissile material for a rudimentary bomb by the end of next year.

What, then, is the real truth about Iran's nuclear program and its potential? And what was the nature of the military program Iran supposedly stopped back in 2003?

The NIE also said that Iran is using a "cost-benefit" analysis in deciding whether to proceed with a nuclear weapons program.

This, however, is a direct challenge to the madman theory. That theory holds that if Iran builds a bomb, Ahmadinejad will use it against Israel or us, or give it to terrorists to use against Israel or us, to start the Armageddon that will bring back the 12th Imam.

But if Iran's regime is rational, which is how it has behaved, if not how it talks, we have an altogether different adversary we can deal with. For while possession of an atom bomb may give Iran a deterrent, it would also set in train a series of almost certain events that would do less to enhance the security of Iran than to imperil it permanently.

If Iran acquires an atomic weapon, Israel will put its nuclear arsenal of hundreds of warheads on a hair trigger.
[note: in violation of our own treaty we ignore Israel's nuclear weapons - which were gotten at least partially, through espionage in the US - it is this sort of outrageous hypocrisy that causes us to lose credibility in the Arab world. I don't like how they got them but I don't blame Israel for having them and they should not disarm but it is absurd to not expect other countries in the region to do likewise, given Israel's bellicose nature. If 'democracy' succeeds in Pakistan and the Neocons don't rig a colored revolution there is a good chance that Pakistan will become an 'Islamist' regime with nuclear capability] The United States would re-target nuclear weapons on Iran. Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia would almost certainly acquire nuclear weapons or a nuclear capacity. How would any of that make Shia Iran safer in a Sunni world?

Finally, if Iran did suspend or terminate its nuclear weapons program in 2003, this suggests that the arrival of the U.S. army in Baghdad and the capture of Saddam concentrated the minds of the mullahs wonderfully. This suggests that those who say Iran, like Libya, had on offer a grand bargain – to give up nuclear ambitions and end its aid to Hamas and Hezbollah, in return for an end to sanctions and the U.S. drive for regime change, and the normalization of relations – may have been right.

Thus, what the NIE implies is that George Bush may have missed the opportunity to put himself in the history books alongside Nixon, who opened up China, and Reagan, who ended the Cold War with Russia.


if George Bush lied or knew the reports of WMD were fake - than he has needlessly caused the death of thousands of Americans, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis and cost us trillions of dollars. Meanwhile, he has ignored our border security, ignored the sinking dollar (perhaps even encouraging it!) , ignored domestic problems and in fact has intentionally damaged the credibility of the US. Why? I don't expect the democrats to pursue an impeachment but perhaps some patriotic Republicans are still left?

Thursday, December 13, 2007

'Democracy' EU Style:

Problem: Voters reject a constitution. Solution: rename it a treaty and don't put it to vote. ::

LISBON, Portugal — European Union leaders signed a new treaty on Thursday that would give the 27-nation bloc a long-term president and streamline its decision-making process.

The treaty _ a slimmed-down version of an abortive European Constitution _ would provide for a more powerful foreign policy official who will lead EU strategy, and scrap the rotating six-month presidency in favor of a maximum five-year term for a president elected by the members.

More decisions would be taken by majority vote, eliminating the need for unanimous endorsement, which in the past has stymied the bloc's efforts to present a united front.

The Lisbon Treaty was endorsed by the EU's 27 leaders two months ago and will come into force after it is ratified by all member states. The aim is to complete that process by 2009.

Unlike the failed constitution proposal, which was derailed by the 'no' votes of French and Dutch voters two years ago, the treaty will not go to referendums in 26 of the member states. Only Ireland will give the citizens a chance to vote on it.

The leaders' refusal to hold referendums has brought Europe-wide protests. The others say they will ratify the document in their parliaments.



As with mass immigration here (and there) and the Iraq war here, voters vote for one thing, special interest groups and lobbyist ignore it and do what the please.

The EU's 'treaty' will put even more power in the hands of unelected buruecrats and an elite that is both out of touch with and in contempt of most Europeans.

War Against Christmas Has Its Roots In Anti-Christian Bigotry

Vdare formally starts its "War Against Christmas" competition. As keenly noted previously, last year we were bombarded with articles from mainstream media claiming no such war existed, which only illustrates just how desperate the ones waging that campaign are to keep people from learning the truth. We here, well me here, at this blog am pretty damn un PC so I will spell it out:

Yes Virginia there is, and the main instigators are the ADL, ACLU, and activist judges and lawyers. Of course reading between the lines one might ask 'is it a Jewish conspiracy" to which I would answer, no, most Jewish people I know, and I am guessing, in general, find the whole thing silly - it is a few loud, well funded aggressive, manipulative activists, including some ultra orthodox Jews, who, ironically are about the most bigoted, and hyper-ethnocentric people on the planet, which doesn't stop them from appealing to our mis-guided sense of fairness and inclusion.

Let's be frank.....Hanukkah is a bs holiday - about as important as St. Catalina's day to most Christians -which was only up-played to specifically 'compete' with Christmas and claim it was 'unfair' that Christian holidays were recognized and Hanukkah wasn't. Could you imagine the furor in Israel if the tiny Christian minority pulled an obscure Saint's day out of its ass and demanded it be on equal footing with Rosh Hosshanah, Passover or Yom Kippur (all far more important than Hanukkah to observant Jews)? That would be like 1933 all over again, wouldn't it? Why is it that Hanukkah decorations always come down right after Christmas even when it comes a month earlier as it does this year? The answer is quite obvious - it is not a real, living holy-day - it is a weapon against Christmas and only serves to try to marginalize Christmas - an in some twisted sense, it is actually following the spirit of that holiday which was at least in some sense, about resisting assimilation. But I'll take a page out of their book -quite frankly, it's offensive and insulting. Oh gawd, I know, I am a bigot, anti semite, nazi, Hitler, blah blah blah. I was told as much when I mentioned to one fanatically pro-Israel Jewish women that I thought Queen Rania was hot (she is) so I can only guess what sort of condemnation this will bring ( you see, according to the woman - a 'liberal' pro abortion lawyer, all Palestinians were animals and liking them meant you hated Jews, no I am not making this up, and needless to say I am off her party invitation list) . But I digress.

Of course, the ADL is pretty aware that more and more people are beginning to see the war on Christmas for what it is - a small minority within a small minority with no real love of "separation of Church and state" - for they adamantly support Israel, but rather an increasingly thinly veiled and deeply felt hatred of Christianity and the Christian west (same advice I give to all leftists and immigrants off the boat who complain about racism - pack your things and get out).

Conscious of this, the ADL is trying to corral as many Sikhs, Hindus, atheists, wiccans, pagans and 'other' it can find, but all the pawns they shove in front of the media doesn't hide the fact this is driven by distinctly Jewish organizations. Much to their credit few are wiling to participate - they like Christmas, as the Non-Christian Japanese and most Asians do.

The ADL has even stooped as far as to try to get some Muslims into the game and have had some mild success. Unfortunately for Foxman, Muslims have great reverence for Christ and the Virgin Mary and of course...there's that whole Palestinian thing..... It's so hard to find good, reliable anti Christian bigots these days! Pathetically enough, they often get help from Christian in Name Only 'churches' like Lutheran Social Services and much to this Anglican's chagrin, the remnants of the Episcopal Church - the Episcopal Church is so far gone I would not be surprised to walk into Christmas Eve services in New York City and find a rabbi and Hindu priest telling us about the spirit of the Diwali, and learning carols have been banned for being offensive . (oh come oh come Emmanuel and ransom captive Israel" was stricken from a folk festival in Chicago last year)

Of course after posting something like this, one is immediately a bigot and anti-semite - for pointing out another group's bigotry - - so, for the record book:

Jewcy.com Fire Foxman ::
The Passion fiasco was hardly the ADL's only effort to alienate and insult American Christians. In November 2005, Foxman delivered a widely publicized speech in which he warned that American Christian organizations were engaged in an insidious campaign to “Christianize” America. It’s a shocking allegation: firstly, because Jewish interfaith groups have developed very strong ties with precisely such organizations in the past decade; and secondly, because conservative Jewish groups have been just as aggressive in their efforts to breach the wall between church and state. While Christian groups can’t get the ornaments of Christianity placed in government buildings, Chabad has succeeded in publicly erecting enormous, gaudy menorahs throughout the country.

From WND:
The Jewish grinch who stole Christmas

I never thought I'd live to see the day that Christmas would become a dirty word. You think it hasn't? Then why is it that people are being prevented from saying it in polite society for fear it will offend?

Schools are being forced to replace "Christmas vacation" with "winter break" in their printed schedules. At Macy's, the word is verboten even though they've made untold millions of dollars from their sympathetic portrayal in the Christmas classic, "Miracle on 34th Street." Carols, even instrumental versions, are banned in certain places. A major postal delivery service has not only made their drivers doff their Santa caps, but ordered them not to decorate their trucks with Christmas wreaths.

How is it, one well might ask, that in a Christian nation this is happening? And in case you find that designation objectionable, would you deny that India is a Hindu country, that Pakistan is Muslim, that Poland is Catholic? That doesn't mean those nations are theocracies. But when the overwhelming majority of a country's population is of one religion, and roughly 90 percent of Americans happen to be one sort of Christian or another, only a damn fool would deny the obvious.

Although it seems a long time ago, it really wasn't, that people who came here from other places made every attempt to fit in. Assimilation wasn't a threat to anyone – it was what the Statue of Liberty represented. E pluribus unum, one out of many, was our motto. The world's melting pot was our nickname. It didn't mean that any group of people had to check their customs, culture or cuisine, at the door. It did mean that they, and especially their children, learned English, and that they learned to live and let live.

That has changed, you may have noticed. And I blame my fellow Jews. When it comes to pushing the multicultural, anti-Christian agenda, you find Jewish judges, Jewish journalists, and the American Civil Liberties Union, at the forefront.

Being Jewish, I should report, Christmas was never celebrated by my family. But what was there not to like about the holiday? To begin with, it provided a welcome two-week break from school. The decorated trees were nice, the lights were beautiful, "It's a Wonderful Life" was a great movie, and some of the best Christmas songs were even written by Jews.



I know, it's 1933 all over again.... Okay onto the article:

War Against Christmas 2007 Competition [II]: Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…More War Against Christmas

By Brenda Walker

There's more ailing Christmas in 2007 America than ACLU attacks on crèches and the dispiriting disappearance of traditional well-wishing. The whole Diversity Industrial Complex has been brought to bear in order to transform Christmas into another celebration of multiculturalism and immigration. America’s unwelcome demographic transformation in combination with leftist politics has been used as a tautological excuse: diversity is already happening, so we citizens should get with the program of welcoming our cultural destruction.

Back in the old days of American America, “Happy Holiday" cards were handy in case you didn't get your Christmas cards mailed in time. But these days, "the Holidays" may include (but are not limited to) Diwali, Kwanzaa, Santa Lucia Day, Hmong New Year, Winter Solstice, Ramadan, Boxing Day, and Las Posadas.

Some defenders of Christmas blame secularization. That’s certainly involved. But we shouldn't forget the part that immigration diversity has played. It has simply become more difficult for public institutions to manage ritual demands for “holiday” inclusiveness. The jellyfish in charge simply find it easier (and less lawsuit-engendering) to celebrate the generic season. Happy Winter, everybody!

The controversy about decorations at the Sea-Tac airport in Washington State is illustrative of the forces at work. In 2006, a local rabbi wanted a menorah to be erected near the airport's seasonal Christmas trees. The bureaucrats reacted by removing religious symbols entirely. According to the Seattle PI, "The port defended its decision by saying its lawyers believed that putting up a menorah would have invited other religious groups to clamor for their own symbols' inclusion." [Airport will celebrate winter, but not Christmas, October 19, 2007]

The Port of Seattle has a whole webpage explaining the "Winter Displays at Sea-Tac" in perfect diversity-speak:

“Advisory Committee Recommendations:

"The Committee recommends that decorations should reflect the Pacific Northwest environment and our diverse community, and convey universal values, such a peace and harmony. These values have roots in many religious faiths and cultures. Our goal is to create an inclusive and warm environment at the airport."

The display's official name is "Seasonal Migration"—honest! (Watch a video here.) The installation is a "monument to winter," according to the designer.

Typically, human societies endure the hardships of winter and celebrate the arrival of spring's renewed life and promise with genuine relief and joy. The diversity agenda seeks to overturn this normal psychological reaction to the physical world into a lifeless political belief.

Another problem that has come with welcoming all cultures willy-nilly is the lack of discrimination, including the inability to tell friend from foe. One of the worst examples in recent memory was the decision of the Empire State Building to be lit up green in October to honor the Islamic holiday Eid-al-Fitr.

It was the first time for the Muslim religion to be so acknowledged, and was not accepted by many who remembered the 9/11 terror attacks just six years before. Investor's Business Daily called the ill-considered recognition "Sharia by the Inch" [October 12, 2007] and derided it as a new low in politically correct appeasement of an avowed enemy.

Jihadists have declared war on the West. Giving this sort of homage to Islam disrespects all things western, in particular Christianity.

Even the actual celebration of Christmas by some nationalities can have a troubling anti-American aspect.

Consider the act of a posada procession in San Francisco: the parade was as much about establishing a Mexican presence as it was remembering Joseph and Mary looking for a room.

“On the nights leading up to Christmas, hundreds of Latin American immigrants tromped through the rain-slick Tenderloin streets enacting a traditional Mexican posada. The parishioners carried statues depicting Mary and Joseph on the road to Bethlehem and ritually knocked on doors, singing ‘In the name of God, I ask you for shelter. My wife is so tired, can we get a place to pass the night?’

“After being repeatedly turned away and told ‘there's no room at the inn,’ the procession arrived at the Golden Gate Avenue church, where all were welcomed with hot drinks, tamales and a piñata for the children.

“‘They sing so loudly,’ Sister Ruiz said. ‘They really identify themselves with José and Maria, the idea of being immigrants in a land that's not your own. [Tenderloin turning into new Latino neighborhood, By Tyche Hendricks, San Francisco Chronicle, January 2, 2006]

Lest you think that the San Francisco posada is an unimportant blip, consider another example of how cultural-religious activities reflect the political. The Virgin of Guadalupe is omnipresent in Mexican religious life, particularly around Christmas. But more than that, the figure is a symbol of Mexican identity, period. You can't go to a reconquista rally without seeing many people carrying the image along with their Che Guevara flags.

So when Los Angeles Archbishop Roger Mahony wears a cassock embroidered with the Virgin of Guadalupe, he is declaring his support for amnesty and open borders for his Mexican flock.

The celebration of Christmas is family- and culture-oriented. America is about freedom, and whatever people want to do in their homes is their own business. But when foreigners demand the public square be given over to their ethnic expressions against America, a line has been crossed.

Open-borders extremists are happy to use Christmas in order to propagate their multicultural agenda. In Britain, the Christmas story beloved by millions is being used as a cheap plot device for a pro-immigrant guilt extravaganza, complete with Beatles songs and other popular music. (Lady Madonna is a great pop tune, but does not relate to Christmas.) The BBC will broadcast a "modern" Nativity play called Liverpool Nativity in which Joseph and Mary are transformed into asylum seekers sent to a Liverpool passport office.

To emphasize the central political message, the evil Herod figure cracks down on immigration to hold on to power. Subtle, eh?

Nothing is sacred when diversity cultists are writing the script. It's all about the indoctrination.

Britain has been at the forefront of the anti-Christmas jihad for some time. In 1998, the Birmingham City Council came up with a new celebration called "Winterval" to create a more multicultural atmosphere.

As Tom Piatak has reported, more recent attempts on the island to remove Christmas include a report from top Labor think tank proposing to "expunge" the festival from the national calendar and "downgrade" Christian celebrations generally were part of a larger scheme of diversity utopianism. British parents would be urged to participate in "birth ceremonies" to pledge a partnership with the state to raise the kiddies in a properly diversified manner. The traditional countryside would be opened up to more minorities so there would be no escape from the new multicultural Britain. [Christmas should be 'downgraded' to help race relations says Labour think tank, Daily Mail, November 1, 2007.]

But America is not much better. The Mainstream Media try every day to beguile us with the new secular religion of diversity über alles: all human problems will melt away magically in the new, improved non-melting pot, they suggest. But as we have seen in the perfect petri dish of Mexifornia, reality is quite different.

Diversity the ideology is doomed to failure because it ignores human nature. Every tribe on earth, including the American tribe, wants to inhabit a community with others who share their values, speak their language and understand their jokes. It's a hard-wired part of human nature.

Christmas is a vital part of the West's cultural heritage and an important battle in the larger war. We must defend it.

The vile hatred of Christmas will NEVER be satiated , as evidenced by the fact that now the demand is to remove the colors red and green from displays, lights, ect. It will never stop until we just start ignoring these idiots, of course activist judges and lawyers will always be there, since Bush, since the Neocons and since liberals ignore our laws on immigration, declaring war, and increasingly, free speech and free association, we can start ignoring their silly anti-Christmas edicts. Let me make this clear, I don't blame Foxman or the ADL or the ACLU, I blame we, the people for not standing up to these hypocritical bullies and for not being more angry and wary of their blatant abuse of our good will and trust.

Okay, that's my last bitch about the anti-Christmas bigots. Not going to let someone like Abe Foxman (who made the most loathsome New Yorker list the same year Bruce Ratner won) spoil things, in fact it just adds more joy to saying "Merry Christmas". ...Heck, I might even turn the next ten daily postings into an advent calendar with images so iconic and Virgin Mary like they might even make my Protestant sensibilities uneasy, just imagine what it will do the bigots!

Cheers, and Merry Christmas Readers.

From "Gates of Vienna" - Does Ethnicity Matter?

Fjordman writes:
Many Americans seem to believe it’s all about the Constitution, and that everybody who sets foot on US soil is equally an American.. Put in the extreme, this view would mean that you could exchange the present US population with 300 million Zulus, yet the USA would still remain as American as apple pie if the Constitution remained in place. I’m not so sure that is true.

I see no indication that ethnicity is irrelevant in the USA. On the contrary, I see indications that the importance of ethnic rivalries is growing within the US along with mass immigration from non-Western countries. The reason why this haven’t had serious repercussions yet is because the white majority clings to the idea that ethnicity doesn’t matter. But as the white majority grows smaller and eventually disappears, these ethnic rivalries could potentially grow a lot worse as there would no longer be a stable majority group in the country.

The USA, and Canada, Australia and New Zealand, were founded as modern states by people of European origins. European Americans made up almost 90% of the population in the USA until a few decades ago. I don’t know about a single example where a country has totally changed its majority population, and where the people who originally shaped the country’s institutions have been rendered a minority, and where this hasn’t resulted in a huge change in that country’s culture.

my favorite comment, in response to someone asking the name of a report that proved that diversity creates mistrust:

Somebody reading this might recall that report.

The study you are talking about was done by Robert Putnam, the Harvard sociologist. He found that "diversity" far from being a strength, actually destroys community cohesion and what he calls "social capital" and what we would probably call "the ties that bind." The study took something like seven years and surveyed hundreds of communities in the US and thousands of people. Of course, It is not rocket science that cramming people from all over the world, many from incompatible cultures, will seriously disrupt an established community -- but then Putnam is a liberal Harvard sociologist, so he had to have a study to "prove" what has been obvious throughout history for thousands of years.



And, I might note they STILL ignore the consequences! But that's what ideology does - blinds one to reality, whether its Bush and the Neocons and their democracy-at-gunpoint-and-everyone-will-be-happy agenda, or the left, 'if we could just hold hands and sing kum by ya, it will be just like "Its a small world" ride at Disneyland.

Of course, like Bush, in light of this evidence the leftists and globalists aren't going to stop - they are gaining enormous power and money from the diversity game and they really don't care how many women are raped, how many christmas trees come down (in fact they see this as a positive) how much violent crime rises - THEY gain power.

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

Newsflash:: Bruce Ratner is a pathological liar.

from dddb: Norman Oder looks at Bruce Ratner's WNYC-radio interview during which he claimed with certainty, 2 days after announcing his project that, "I have never, ever seen a project get less protest than this.


of course, the most humorous thing about this vintage Ratner fib is it implies he, or the state, or Bloomberg were interested in any sort of democratic process.

As long as he could get his fat, slimy hands on taxpayer money (without being investigated), can one imagine that Ratner would care, on iota, what people thought? Once he was done using his astroturf community groups and various compensated reverends, did he care, one iota about their opinion about his Barclay's deal?

Once he was done getting money from one angry investor did he care? No, he couldn't even remember:
When Greene confronted Ratner with the alleged breach of contract at the end of 2004, Ratner told him, “I don’t remember what I said. As you know, I have a memory problem,” the court papers said.

The Perfect Gift This Christmas Season.

"Muslim lawyer sues over Inter Milan 'Crusaders' kit"

"A Turkish lawyer is taking legal action against Inter Milan, the Italian football team, for wearing a strip with “Crusader-style” red crosses that he alleges is ”offensive to Muslim sensibilities”.

Baris Kaska, a lawyer in Izmir who specialises in European law, said that he had lodged a complaint in a local court against Inter Milan, which last month played the Istanbul team Fenerbahce in a Champions League match at the San Siro stadium in Milan. The Inter players wore a new strip - a white shirt with a giant red cross on it - marking the club's centenary. "


Muslims invaded Europe and Christian nations like Spain long before the Crusades. Do we get to be offended and ban the star and crescent? Okay, savvy readers will know the answer to that - since the objective of the people - the cultural marxists and globalists - is to destroy the west and break the nation state, the answer is a resounding no.

Personally, I'd love one, and hope they become the best-selling jersey in both Europe and America. Wow, a sports franchise symbol that actually means something!

Note the resemblance to the English flag? Is that too, offensive...well yes - during the world cup of soccer, English nationals were told not to fly the English flag. I am waiting for some self righteous idiot in the Guardian or Independent to say yes, Inter Milan should get rid of this symbol. Thus is the mad, mad state of the West.

The War On Christmas, 2007

Despite leftist claims there s none the evidence that there is one is quite overwhelming. What does that say when leftists HAVE TO lie about their objectives eh? A nice summary at Vdare:

[Merry Christmas! Actually, we’re not quite ready to post our formal announcement of VDARE.COM’s eighth Annual War Against Christmas Competition, which offers prizes for reporting the most outrageous attempt to abolish Christmas, BECAUSE PETER BRIMELOW HASN'T FINISHED WRITING IT UP YET. But here’s what he wrote last year—follow the links for the history of this important new American institution. Don’t forget to go in through a VDARE.COM Amazon link (like this) when you buy Christmas gifts—we get a commission at no cost to you. And don’t forget to buy gifts at our new VDARE.COM store. Ho Ho!]

The War Against Christmas Is A War On The West

By Tom Piatak

The now-standard liberal response to discussion of the war against Christmas is to deny that any such war exists.

But that denial became harder after Britain’s Daily Mail reported on November 1, 2007 that the Institute for Public Policy Research, a leading Labour think tank, was advocating that Christmas be "downgraded." Such a downgrading would be part of an "urgent and upfront campaign" to promote a "multicultural understanding of Britishness." [Christmas should be 'downgraded' to help race relations says Labour think tank, By James Chapman] This downgrading would be accomplished by promoting other holidays at the expense of Christmas: "If we are going to continue as a nation to mark Christmas—and it would be very hard to expunge it from our national life even if we wanted to—then public organizations should mark other religious festivals too," the report said.

Of course, the type of campaign explicitly advocated by the Institute for Public Policy Research has been underway on both sides of the Atlantic for some time now.

bulletThe Spokane schools recently came under fire for sending out a list of "important dates" that included "Hanukkah, Human Rights Day, winter break, the Islamic holy day Eid al-Adha, first day of winter and Kwanzaa"—but made no mention of Christmas.

According to the district spokesman Terren Roloff, [Email]"it was absolutely an error of omission. In our efforts to be inclusive, we missed the obvious." [School Newsletter Omits Christmas from December 'Important Dates', AP, November 30, 2007]

Funny how that keeps happening.

But, of course, that is the real point of what is mendaciously termed "inclusion"—the displacement of traditional holidays and cultural symbols.

bulletThis year, Oak Lawn, Illinois schools temporarily replaced school observances of Halloween and Christmas with "Fall Festival" and "Winter Festival" after a Moslem parent demanded inclusion of Moslem observances.

bulletAnd a task force created in Fort Collins, Colorado, after a request was made for a public menorah display recommended that "secular symbols of winter, like snowflakes, penguins and white lights" be displayed instead of Christmas trees and red and green lights.

The Fort Collins task force also recommended that if religious or cultural symbols are displayed, such "symbols must show at least two religious or cultural celebrations." [The Holiday Display Task Force wants the city to move toward non-religious, non-cultural displays Rebecca Boyle, Greeley Tribune News October 29, 2007]

bulletAnd, of course, the Seattle Airport, after temporarily removing Christmas trees last year, decided this year to display a group of trees to "reflect the Pacific Northwest environment and our diverse community, and convey universal values, such as peace and harmony." But there are no Christmas trees.

According to Aviation Director Mark Reis, [email him] "the very traditional, single, iconic Christmas tree is not one of the areas we will be exploring."[Airport will celebrate winter, but not Christmas | After last year's holiday hubbub, port strips all religious symbols from decor By Kristen Millares Young, October 19, 2007]

Increased public awareness of the war against Christmas means that the multicultural bureaucrats no longer automatically get their way. The Oak Lawn schools decided, after public outcry, to retain Halloween and Christmas celebrations. The Fort Collins City Council bowed to popular pressure and voted 6-1 to keep public displays of Christmas trees and lights. This grass-roots public resistance is certainly encouraging.

However, the Oak Lawn schools also felt obliged to add a Ramadan celebration and the Fort Collins council similarly felt the need to create a multicultural display focused on nine separate winter holidays at a local museum.

They may even have been right to do so: local government should respond to local conditions, and the Oak Lawn school board and the Fort Collins City Council are more familiar with conditions in those communities than any outsider.

But it makes no sense to couple every observance of the holiday observed by 96% of Americans with observances of all the holidays that will now be commemorated in the Fort Collins museum. In fact, as the Institute for Public Policy Research understands, such an approach would effectively downgrade Christmas and draw us closer to the day when traditional notions of American patriotism are replaced by multiculturalist shibboleths.

Those assailing Christmas are, generally speaking, the same people who cheer on the mass immigration that is transforming the West and approve of other aspects of what has been termed "cultural Marxism"—the systematic attempt to demonize the West and discredit Western traditions. But, because of its religious origin, Christmas has an additional enemy, an enemy motivated by a hatred of God as well as a general hatred of the West: the embittered atheist.

Thus, Harper’s Magazine in its December issue chose to prominently feature a piece, by David K. Lewis and Philip Kitcher, [Email] arguing that belief in God is inherently evil, and likening a Christian who lives a good life to a neo-Nazi who admires Hitler but does not himself engage in genocide. [And Lead Us Not, (subscriber content)]

But the leading confluence of the war against Christmas and embittered atheism this year is unquestionably Hollywood’s decision to observe Christmas by releasing The Golden Compass, a movie based on the first volume of British atheist Philip Pullman’s fantasy trilogy for children.

Lest there be any doubt what Pullman’s objective is, he told the Washington Post in 2001 that "I’m trying to undermine the basis of Christian belief" and the Sydney Morning Herald in 2003 that "My books are about killing God." [The shed where God died By Steve Meacham, December 13, 2003]

Pullman, in fact, is the perfect representative of today’s multicultural, post-Christian Britain: contemptuous of the literary tradition in which he writes, filled with hatred for the basis of his civilization, and advocating the displacement of traditional morality by unbridled sexual license and an assortment of PC platitudes.

Pullman has dismissed The Lord of the Rings, the greatest of all fantasy novels and one of the monumental creations of the 20th century, as "fundamentally an infantile work" and a "trivial book." He has described C. S. Lewis’ much-loved Chronicles of Narnia as "morally loathsome," and even lobbied against making the Narnia books into a movie, telling the BBC in October 2005 that Lewis’ tales were "a peevish blend of racist, misogynistic and reactionary prejudice."

And Pullman, like so many of the angry new atheists, has a deep hatred for the institution that did more to create the West than any other: the Catholic Church. He named the villainous organization against which his heroes battle "The Magisterium"—the name used for the teaching authority of the Catholic Church—and dismisses Tolkien precisely because he was a Catholic. Pullman told MTV on November 1, 2007 that The Lord of the Rings is "trivial" because “For Tolkien, the Catholic, the Church had the answers, the Church was the source of all truth, so 'Lord of the Rings' does not touch those big deep questions." ['His Dark Materials' Writer Starts Fantasy-Book Beef, By Jennifer Vineyard, November 1, 2007]

There was a time Hollywood observed Christmas by giving us "It’s a Wonderful Life" and "Miracle on 34th Street". Now instead we get atheist propaganda disguised as children’s literature.

Despite his own efforts to prevent Lewis’ stories from being filmed, Pullman is quite upset at the Christian critics of his film, describing them as "nitwits." In fact, the "nitwits" are those who embrace the world view of Pullman and the British think tank that wants to "downgrade" Christmas, those who dismiss our past as "reactionary" and "racist" and "misogynistic," and who seek to tear down Christmas and all other traditions rooted in Christianity.

There is, unfortunately, no doubt that such values are now ascendant in Britain, and that such values are gaining currency here.

But nations which embrace such values die, even as Britain is dying today. In 2006, 207,000 Britons emigrated, the highest number since before World War I, when Britons had a vast empire to emigrate to. And a BBC poll in 2006 showed that over half of Britons have considered emigrating in their lifetimes.

A variety of factors have most likely prompted this enormous number to consider leaving Shakespeare’s "scepter’d isle." But there can be no doubt that the War Against Christmas, and the broader war against the West of which it is a part, plays a role.

The reader comments to the Daily Mail piece on "downgrading" Christmas contained many comments from those who had left Britain, or were planning to do so.

bulletOne reader wrote from Birmingham, "I just can’t wait to get out of this appalling country…. This sounds like the sort of drivel we had foisted on us 10 years ago in Birmingham when the council tried to replace Christmas with Winterval."

bulletA reader residing in China wrote, "A sinking nation with no sense of national pride—glad I left."

Multicultural drivel and a loss of national pride—that is what we have to look forward to if the War Against Christmas, and the concomitant war against the West, succeeds.

Christmas is a beloved and popular festival, with tremendous cultural, historical, and theological significance. It has brought joy to millions and harm to no one.

As we are learning from Britain, a country that cannot summon the will to defend Christmas is unlikely to summon the will to defend much of anything else of value.

That is why the war against Christmas is so important—and why those waging it do not want even to admit it exists.

Tom Piatak (email him) writes from Cleveland, Ohio.




How did we wake up to this living nightmare? Who, Why?